JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Norris, M. C. Articles by Huffnagle, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Norris, M. C. Articles by Huffnagle, S.

Complications of Labor Analgesia

Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques

Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Both epidural and combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia can provide maternal pain relief during labor. Currently, there are few data comparing the risks and complications of these two techniques. We recorded the incidence and severity of anesthetic-related complications in 1022 laboring parturients. Ninety-eight women opted for either no or parenteral analgesia, 388 chose epidural, and 536 requested CSE analgesia. Women choosing CSE analgesia most often received an intrathecal injection of sufentanil 10 µg at the time of epidural catheter insertion. The epidural catheters were then dosed as needed as the intrathecal analgesia waned. Women who received CSE analgesia were more likely to itch (41.4% vs 1.3%) or complain of nausea (2.4% vs 1.0%) or vomiting (3.2% vs 1.0%) than those receiving solely epidural analgesia. Patients who requested only epidural analgesia were more likely to suffer an unintended dural puncture (4.2% vs 1.7%). Fewer than 10% developed hypotension with either technique. The risk of headache was the same with both anesthetics (4%–10%) and did not differ from the incidence of headache in women not receiving neuraxial analgesia (10%–14%). Six patients required epidural blood patch for moderate to severe postural headache. Four of these women suffered a dural puncture with the 18-gauge Hustead epidural needle. The other two women had reportedly uncomplicated epidural and CSE analgesia. These data suggest either neuraxial analgesic technique can safely relieve the pain of labor. CSE analgesia is a safe alternative to epidural analgesia for labor and delivery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. K. Karmakar, X. Li, A. M.-H. Ho, W. H. Kwok, and P. T. Chui Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2009; 102(6): 845 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. O. Chan and M. J. Paech Persistent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Complication of the Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 828 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. H. Ross, C. H. Moore, P. H. Pan, R. Y. Fragneto, R. L. James, and G. B. Justis Reduced Duration of Intrathecal Sufentanil Analgesia in Laboring Cocaine Users Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1504 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R. Connelly, R. K. Parker, T. Lucas, M. El-Mansouri, V. Komanduri, P. Nayak, S. Gutta, C. Gibson, and S. M. Dunn The Influence of a Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Epidural Infusion After Epidural Fentanyl in Patients Allowed to Ambulate in Early Labor Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 1001 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R. Connelly, R. K. Parker, V. Vallurupalli, S. Bhopatkar, and S. Dunn Comparison of Epidural Fentanyl Versus Epidural Sufentanil for Analgesia in Ambulatory Patients in Early Labor Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 374 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Birnbach Obstetric Anesthesiology in the New Millennium Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2000; 90(5): 1241 - 1243. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Dunn, N. R. Connelly, R. K. Parker, and Y. Beilin Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH) and Combined Spinal-Epidural (CSE) Response Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2000; 90(5): 1249 - 1250. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Fournier, E. Van Gessel, A. Weber, and Z. Gamulin A Comparison of Intrathecal Analgesia with Fentanyl or Sufentanil After Total Hip Replacement Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2000; 90(4): 918 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Crowhurst and D. J. Birnbach Small-Dose Neuraxial Block: Heading Toward the New Millennium Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2000; 90(2): 241 - 241. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Beilin, A. B. Leibowitz, H. H. Bernstein, and S. E. Abramovitz Controversies of Labor Epidural Analgesia Anesth. Analg., October 1, 1999; 89(4): 969 - 969. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Bromage, S. Huffnagle, and M. C. Norris The influence of epidural needle bevel on spread of sensory blockade in the laboring parturient. Anesth. Analg., April 1, 1999; 88(4): 962 - 963. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999